Difference between revisions of "HVOR"

From Icelandic Parsed Historical Corpus (IcePaHC)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
  
 
+
==HVOR ÖÐRUM as NP-OB1==
 
When "(hvor) öðrum" is clearly the object (or "hvor" is ambiguous between being part of the object or a floated quantifier) and "hvor" and "öðrum" appear adjacent, they are grouped together as an NP constituent with the appropriate clause-level argument label, as below.  NOTE: This is done regardess of the case-marking of "hvor".
 
When "(hvor) öðrum" is clearly the object (or "hvor" is ambiguous between being part of the object or a floated quantifier) and "hvor" and "öðrum" appear adjacent, they are grouped together as an NP constituent with the appropriate clause-level argument label, as below.  NOTE: This is done regardess of the case-marking of "hvor".
  
Line 14: Line 14:
 
  (VBDI rituðu-rita)
 
  (VBDI rituðu-rita)
 
  (NP-TMP (NS-D stundum-stundum))
 
  (NP-TMP (NS-D stundum-stundum))
  (NP-OB1 (Q-N hvor-hvor) (OTHER-D öðrum-annar)))
+
  (NP-OB1 (NP (Q-N hvor-hvor)) (OTHER-D öðrum-annar)))
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
  

Revision as of 11:41, 28 September 2010

'hvor', as in hvor hjá öðrum 'each with the other'. Treat the whole thing as NP-ADV. This parse is used *only* where *neither* "hvor" or "öðrum" are an argument of the verb *and* "öðrum" is inside a PP.

	    (NP-ADV (NP (Q-N hvor-hvor))
		    (PP (P hjá-hjá)
			(NP (OTHER-D öðrum-annar))))

HVOR ÖÐRUM as NP-OB1

When "(hvor) öðrum" is clearly the object (or "hvor" is ambiguous between being part of the object or a floated quantifier) and "hvor" and "öðrum" appear adjacent, they are grouped together as an NP constituent with the appropriate clause-level argument label, as below. NOTE: This is done regardess of the case-marking of "hvor".

( (IP-MAT (NP-SBJ (PRO-N þeir-hann))
	  (VBDI rituðu-rita)
	  (NP-TMP (NS-D stundum-stundum))
	  (NP-OB1 (NP (Q-N hvor-hvor)) (OTHER-D öðrum-annar)))

HVOR ANNAR

When "(hvor) öðrum" is clearly the object of a preposition and "hvor" and "öðrum" appear adjacent, they are grouped together as a bare NP and under that hvor has its own bare NP. This may not be a good analysis but it allows us to enforce case agreement inside NPs (as opposed to not having hvor project an NP).

   (PP (P við) 
       (NP (NP (Q-N hvor-hvor)) (OTHER-A annan-annar)))


If *neither* "hvor" or "öðrum" are an argument of the verb but there is no PP involved:

   (NP-ADV (NP (Q-N hvor-hvor))
	   (OTHER-D öðrum-annar))

SITT ORÐ HVOR

          (CP-THT-PRN-1 (C að-að)
			(IP-SUB (IP-SUB (NP-SBJ (PRO-N hann-hann))
					(VBDI þóttist-þykja)
					(IP-INF (VB sjá-sjá)
						(NP-OB1 (NS-A hrafna-hrafn) (NUM-A tvo-tveir))))
				(CONJP (CONJ og-og)
				       (IP-SUB (NP-SBJ *pro*)
					       (VBDI kváðu-kveða)
					       (NP-OB1 (D-A þetta-þessi))
					       (NP-ADV (NP (NP-POS (PRO-A sitt-sinn))
							   (N-A orð-orð))
						       (NP (Q-N hvor-hvor)))))))